Great Media and Communication Debates: WSIS and the MacBride Report
نویسنده
چکیده
Author(s): Mansell, Robin; Nordenstreng, Kaarle Title: Great media and communication debates: WSIS and the MacBride report Year: 2006 Journal Title: Information Technologies and International Development Vol and number: 3 : 4 Pages: 15-36 Publisher: USC Annenberg School for Communication ISSN: 1544-7529 Discipline: Media and communications Item Type: Journal Article Language: en URN: URN:NBN:fi:uta-201511262460 URL: http://itidjournal.org/itid/article/view/235/105
منابع مشابه
Cross border E-Science and Research Partnership: Bridging the Gap Between Science and Media
E-Science is a tool that helps scientists to store, interpret, analyze and make a network of their data, and it can play a critical role in different aspects of the scientific goals and research. This commentary, under the topic of Cross Border E-Science and Research Partnership: Bridging the Gap between Science and Media,[1] attempts to shed light on E-Science with emphasis on three importa...
متن کاملکاربرد آموزش فن آوری چندرسانه ای در حیطه مهارت های اجتماعی دانش آموزان اتیسم
Increasing usage of information technology and communication predict a great development in all areas, especially in education and learning. In recent decades, because of emerging modern technologies like multi-media, meta-media and tele-communications, classical perspectives in learning are faced with critical changes. Today, modern technologies are used by most countries in special education....
متن کاملThe Ontological Turn Misunderstood: How to Misunderstand David Armstrong’s Theory of Possibility
Armstrong says of his theory of possibility that it is ‘reductionist’. Fraser MacBride has argued at great length that it fails to be reductionist because for some statements it fails to provide non-modal truth-conditions. I argue that MacBride misunderstands Armstrong’s theory because its aim is not to provide truth-conditions. This illustrates how great a gulf there is between semantics and m...
متن کاملCritical Discourse Analysis of Hedges and Boosters in Iranian TV Election Debates of Presidential Candidates
To win the attention of the audience, presidential candidates rely on their own rhetorical methods. Hedges and boosters as metadiscourse markers have been the focus of many studies as the communicative strategies enabling speakers to soften the force of utterances or moderate their assertive force. TV news was used as the corpus of this study, whereas most of the previous studies have focused o...
متن کاملWsis as a World of Words What Can We Say about so Much Talking? a Lexicon-textual Analysis of Wsis, Looking at the Final Documents from the First Phase of the Summit
We present a lexicon-textual analysis of final documents from the first phase of the World Summit on the Information Society together with reflections on the authors, their visions of information society and their ideas on governance. We suggest that a “common vision of the information society” is yet to emerge. WSIS has contributed to an identification of actors and positions relating to socie...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007